Status. Proposed design only. Nothing in this vault is GGA client approval. The GGA client documents are supplied drafts: see GGA-Source-Digest. No application, service or test has been executed; every scenario is Not executed. Delivery fees and dates are open.

DG24 · New service software stays outside Balanced

FieldValue
StatusNot executed
TypeScope guard
Layer / kindScope guard · design/API review
Priority—
GatesS01, S02, S03, S04, S05, S06, S07
Build step12 (GGA order; the 1.3 step is history)
DecisionsQ12, Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16, Q17, Q18, Q08

Disposition under GGA

FieldValue
DispositionReframed
GGA basisBlueprint pp. 1, 16 (GGA-Requirement-Register)
Replaced or carried byGS25-staged
Still opennone
What changesThe scope guard against service software becomes the guard for the Blueprint’s deferred items.

The 1.3 text below is kept verbatim as history. Where the disposition is Reframed, Superseded or Parked it is not the GGA oracle; use the replacing scenario. A Parked scenario has no GGA feedback and stays a Proposed carry-forward. The status stays Not executed. Register: Scenario-Dispositions.

Given

DG requests joined private thread, proactive named dashboard, automatic ledger/outcomes or refund routing.

When

Review requested change and attempt current ordinary DG routes.

Then / oracle

Record as additional scope, not an existing capability or launch requirement. Current private-body/overdue routes deny. New access model, consent, data, acceptance, costs and schedule require separate decision. Manual procedures do not imply those software features exist.

Evidence required

Change disposition and current access evidence linked T28/T30/T33; future features remain Not included.

Decision dependency (verbatim)

Q08/Q12–Q18 plus D09/D10: explicit scope/acceptance change before development.

Source: TDD rev 1.3 (PDF); machine-readable in 10-Sources/tdd-bundle/. Back to Scenario-Index · Traceability-Matrix · integration dependencies in Dependency-and-Regression-Table.