Status. Proposed design only. Nothing in this vault is DG client approval. No application, service or test has been executed; every scenario is Not executed. Fees and dates are open.
T07 · Rule recommendations explain evidence and gaps
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Status | Not executed |
| Type | Balanced software |
| Layer / kind | Unit · API |
| Priority | P1 |
| Gates | A01 |
| Build step | Step-05-Discovery-and-Rule-Ranking |
| Decisions | Q03 |
Given
A offers capability X and seeks Y; synthetic B offers Y; C has unknown Y. Fixed approved ranking fixtures include an asymmetric capital/return case.
When
Run the same rule version repeatedly and change one approved input.
Then / oracle
Eligibility is applied before ranking. Evidence points to authorised fields; missing data is labelled unknown, not fabricated fit or automatic contradiction. Results are deterministic for fixed inputs/ties. No AI output or deal-success probability appears.
Evidence required
Rule-version fixture and expected order; allowed-field explanation snapshot; asymmetric case.
Decision dependency (verbatim)
Q03: rule weights, mandatory filters and tie order; no 80% usefulness gate in Balanced.
Source: TDD rev 1.3 (PDF); machine-readable in 10-Sources/tdd-bundle/. Back to Scenario-Index · Traceability-Matrix · integration dependencies in Dependency-and-Regression-Table.