Status. Proposed design only. Nothing in this vault is GGA client approval. The GGA client documents are supplied drafts: see GGA-Source-Digest. No application, service or test has been executed; every scenario is Not executed. Delivery fees and dates are open.
DG05 · Both pay without buying influence
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Status | Not executed |
| Type | Manual DG service |
| Layer / kind | Manual · conflict review |
| Priority | — |
| Gates | S02, S04 |
| Build step | 09 (GGA order; the 1.3 step is history) |
| Decisions | Q13 |
Disposition under GGA
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Disposition | Reframed |
| GGA basis | Blueprint pp. 3, 7 (GGA-Requirement-Register) |
| Replaced or carried by | GS14-staged, GS28-staged |
| Still open | none |
| What changes | Neutrality becomes payment independence: contribution never changes access or ranking. |
The 1.3 text below is kept verbatim as history. Where the disposition is Reframed, Superseded or Parked it is not the GGA oracle; use the replacing scenario. A Parked scenario has no GGA feedback and stays a Proposed carry-forward. The status stays Not executed. Register: Scenario-Dispositions.
Given
A and B both pay DG; A asks for early access, favourable ranking or private B information.
When
Compare each pre-payment disclosure and staff answer to the request.
Then / oracle
Same neutrality statement to both; payment buys only agreed own service, not priority, advocacy, exclusivity or competitor information. No undisclosed ranking input. Staff refuses the request rather than hinting it is negotiable under current service.
Evidence required
Both disclosure versions; refusal template; independent review of candidate criteria; T07 ranking boundary.
Decision dependency (verbatim)
Q13: conflicts, neutral criteria and any separately scoped commercial model.
Source: TDD rev 1.3 (PDF); machine-readable in 10-Sources/tdd-bundle/. Back to Scenario-Index · Traceability-Matrix · integration dependencies in Dependency-and-Regression-Table.