Status. Proposed design only. Nothing in this vault is DG client approval. No application, service or test has been executed; every scenario is Not executed. Fees and dates are open.

Review Record Extension

Original: extension-review.txt. A design-agent review, not DG approval.

---

Message 207f3110a0e0 Room: 180178711170 Sender: agent:22b17a299d93 Parent: ba78f9ec2776 Sent at: 2026-10-20T09:08:36.496Z Attachments:

• dg-round3-dg-replies.md file=f21bcbc8e383 text/markdown 18 KB download: kylon workspace file download —file f21bcbc8e383 —dir ./attachments Reference (mention): user:52e636bf75ed

@Golu All four corrections are accepted and the clarifications are folded in. The updated file is dg-round3-dg-replies.md, now v2. I fixed the four bad lines in place and added a Revision 2 section at the end. Where the two conflict, Revision 2 wins.

• Counterparty status: my “They declined” reply broke DG08. It’s replaced everywhere by the one sentence you proposed, used for decline, silence or no approach.
• Advisory disputes: a quality complaint is open when a required check was missed or the advice was materially wrong, as well as for missing or out-of-scope comments. “Sent” is never accepted or completed. The record reads “comments sent; completion claimed against [criteria]; owner acceptance/dispute [state]“.
• Bought sessions: the DG one-to-one is owed. A meeting with a commercial counterparty is not.
• Takedown: the first receipt says “request recorded, unsent items held, removal [requested / in progress / confirmed with evidence]“. Nothing is “removed” until there’s evidence.

Guests, group sessions, channels, verified-candidate lapse, opt-out and wiki status are also covered in Revision 2. The benefit is renamed “partner discovery and consent-based introduction assistance”. The wiki stays historical-labelled, with no “Passed” and no DG approval claimed.

Verdict: accept with conditions.

1. Every sentence about introductions uses the single non-disclosing wording.
2. “Sent”, “claimed complete”, “accepted” and “disputed” stay as separate states.
3. No completion claim without action evidence.
4. Each public channel has its own permission record.

The pending values stay pending, and I set none: session quantity and remedy, verification expiry and appeal, guest-matrix and intake retention, whether formal offer review is wanted, remedy-review awards and decider, and service notices after opt-out. Write DG25 onward as conditional on those. This is a design-agent verdict, not DG client approval. Message 449455fc831e Room: 180178711170 Sender: agent:22b17a299d93 Parent: ba78f9ec2776 Sent at: 2026-10-20T09:16:27.792Z Attachments: 0 Reference (mention): user:52e636bf75ed

@Golu Final DG-side verdict: approved as proposed design, with three small text additions before export. I checked the extension data, the reference index and the Q19–Q25 text in the HTML.

What checks out

• Corrections: all four of my Revision 2 conditions are in. DG34 uses the DG08 safe wording and “no silent unverified substitute”. DG30 keeps sent, claimed complete, accepted and disputed apart, with an independent review. DG33 says the promised session is owed and a counterparty meeting is not guaranteed. DG42 allows no “removed” claim before evidence, and DG39–41 carry per-channel permission.
• Scope: Balanced, Manual and Added scope stay distinct. Formal DG offer review is not folded into Comprehensive, and member tier is kept separate from software options.
• Blank terms: no prices, fees or remedy values are set. Everything unresolved points to a Q19–Q25 decision.
• Status: all 20 new cases say “Not executed”. The index’s count of 84 scenarios matches (40 + 24 + 20). The HTML mentions “Passed” only in rules saying not to claim it. The JSON text is clean, with no corrupted characters.

Three additions

1. DG35, newsletter retry. Add a duplicate-send check, as DG38 has for promotions. A retried newsletter must not double-send, and an ambiguous send is reconciled before retrying.
2. DG32, owner cancellation. Add the owner cancelling their own session with notice. Record it as owner-cancelled, not DG-unmet, with no credit invented. Today the case covers DG cancellation, owner no-show, capacity and provider failure.
3. DG44 or the index. State that this verdict is a design-agent opinion, not DG client approval. DG44 and the index already say it, but it should appear once in the “Start here” section too, where a reader lands first.

One caution for the export. The index points to wiki files, the PDF, README.txt, document-checks.json and the Gherkin files, and none of those were in my attachments. I can’t vouch for those links or the PDF page counts (60–80). Run your own link and anchor check on the extracted folder before final export.